Agreement Maxim

The maxim of agreement is: « Minimize the expression of disagreements between yourself and others; Maximizes the expression of concordance between oneself and others. It is in line with Brown and Levinson`s positive courtesy strategies of « Seeking Agreement » and « Avoiding Differences » to which they attach great importance. However, it is not claimed that people avoid disagreements altogether. We simply observe that they are much more direct in expressing concordance as a disagreement. For example, the spokesperson keeps pace by minimizing costs to the recipient, using two speech markers, one to appeal to solidarity, you know, and the other should be a modifying cover, really, a recruitment preacher, I think, and a modalverb. On the other hand, the speaker maximizes the benefits for the addresses of the second part of the curve, indicating that by selling the car, it saves a lot of time and money. The maxim of approval involves minimizing disapproval and mazimization of praise to spokespeople/listeners. The maxim of approval applies only to delocatory functions classified as « experiential », for example.B. Thank you, congratulations, forgiveness, blames, praises, condolences, etc. And « Assertive » z.B.

Saying, boasting, complaining, reproducing, etc.[13] Maxime approval is closed to the strategy of courtesy to avoid disagreements. Examples (7) and (8) serve to illustrate the dislocationist functions of gratitude and complaint, in which the spokesperson maximizes the praise of the recipient by (7) and minimizes refusal in (8): « Minimize the expression of convictions, express disapproval of others; Maximizes the expression of convictions that express adherence to others. It`s best to praise others and, if that`s impossible, get around the problem, provide some sort of minimal response (possibly using euphemisms), or remain silent. The first part of the maxim avoids disagreements; the second part aims to give others a sense of well-being through solidarity. For example, the cadence says, « Minimize the expression of beliefs that cost others; Maximizes the expression of beliefs that imply a benefit to others. The first part of this maxim corresponds to Brown and Levinson`s strategy of negative courtesy to minimize taxation, and the second part reflects the positive strategy of courtesy to look after the interests, wants, and needs of the listener. For example, the maximum speed is not respected, which testifies to extreme irritation with different behavior, that is, rude. The maxim of generosity involves minimizing benefits and maximizing costs to oneself. The maxims of generosity apply only to impositives and commissives. [12] Maxime`s generosity focuses more on the spokesperson/sender.

Courtesy when speaking can analyze in the sentence structure of the use by the spokesperson and the listener. It is common that what the spokesperson said in this case is considered pragmatic, able to measure the level and adequacy of the sentence said. In this case, the verification of the types of maxims. Leech divided into six types of analysis of the maxim as courtesy. While sharing some of the maximum leeuckers as scale or size as a standard of courtesy. Leech`s maxim of generosity says: « Minimize the expression of beliefs that express or imply benefits to themselves; Maximizes the expression of beliefs that express or imply the cost to oneself. Contrary to the maxim of cadence, the maxim of generosity focuses on the spokesperson and says that it is others who should take precedence and not the self. For example, the maxim of sympathy says, « Minimize antipathy between oneself and others; Maximizes sympathy between the self and the other. These include a small group of words such as congratulations, compassion and condolences – all in keeping with Brown and Levinson`s positive courtesy strategy, to look after the interests, wants and needs of the listener. For example, when considering the question of courtesy, Leech stated that the language of courtesy should in principle be attentive to the six maxims of courtesy; There are maxims of measure, maxims of generosity, maxims of approval, maxims of modesty, maxims of convergence and maxims of sympathy. [3] According to Geoffrey Leech, there is a principle of courtesy with maxims of conversation similar to those of Paul Grice. .

. .

Posté dans Non classé